Highlights
- In-depth investigation conducted on titanium dioxide free film coated tablets revealed degradation risks from photostability, physical stability and chemical stability.
- Calcium carbonate-based film coating was identified as the preferred replacement for titanium dioxide, however risks were identified related to chemical degradation of base-labile APIs.
- Titanium dioxide was found to be a superior opacifier to all titanium dioxide-free coatings as all tablets exhibited a degree of photodegradation.
- The composition of titanium dioxide free film coats and the increased weight gain required by them was found to impact the physical stability of the amorphous API.
Abstract
Titanium Dioxide (E171 Grade, TiO2) is widely used as a component of film coats for pharmaceutical drug products for its opacifying and coloring properties. However, recent concerns by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) over long-term safety have prompted the search for alternative film coats. This study investigates the stability impacts of replacing TiO2 in the film coating of a fixed-dose combination product containing two co-formulated active pharmaceutical ingredients. Three potential replacements were evaluated: a calcium carbonate (CaCO3)-based coating and two rice starch-based coatings. The photostability, physical stability, and chemical stability of the tablets were assessed during various stability experiments. Photostability experimentation revealed that while CaCO3 provided acceptable protection against UV-induced degradation of one of the APIs, it required a higher weight gain compared to TiO2 to achieve the same level of opacity and UV protection. Rice starch coatings showed insufficient opacifying properties and led to color changes under UV exposure. Physical stability tests indicated that all TiO2-free coatings increased the propensity for API crystallization due to moisture absorption, with rice starch coatings being the most severe. Chemical stability highlighted potential degradation risks with CaCO3 coatings due to base-induced degradation pathways on a base-labile API. However, the result indicates that this degradation was limited to the film coat/core interface. Overall, while compared to rice starch, CaCO3 was a more suitable replacement for TiO2 as an opacifier in the film coat, it may still lead to stability risks not seen with TiO2. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of TiO2 alternatives in pharmaceutical formulations.
Introduction
Titanium Dioxide (E171 Grade, TiO2) is a commonly used excipient within food and pharmaceutical products, widely utilized for its unique properties as an opacifier and colorant while being non-toxic and inert.1, 2, 3 A survey conducted in 2021 by the European Medicines Agenda (EMA) estimated that nearly 70 % of all tablets manufactured by the surveyed companies contained TiO2. While considered safe for consumption and used for over fifty years in pharmaceutical products, recent studies have raised concerns over the impact of long-term exposure to nano-sized TiO2. In 2022, the EMA began banning TiO2 for use within food products due to its suspected carcinogenic properties and recent legislative proposals within the United States shows many states have efforts to pass similar restrictions. While these findings have been challenged by the FDA and experts in the field8, this has nevertheless led to the rapid evaluation of potential replacements with the ideal material possessing comparable attributes as an opacifier and colorant to TiO2.
Replacements for TiO2 within drug products has been sparsely studied until recently. A review of these studies published in 2022 by the IQ Consortium Working Group has indicated that minimal success has been found in TiO2 alternatives due to replacements being inferior opacifiers, difficulties creating a uniform tablet appearance, and observations of color fading. Only two published assessments were identified by the IQ Consortium Review with neither concluding that a direct replacement for TiO2 could be found and that replacement coating would have to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. In addition, alternative film coats are expected to have in vitro and in vivo impacts as well. Further, it is expected that any replacement would require a higher weight gain of film coating due to opacity concerns compared to TiO2. Additional studies have since been reported as the pharmaceutical industry continually evaluates replacements, including case studies evaluating alternative film coats impact on light protection, film coat adhesion, appearance, and dissolution.13, 14, 15 Throughout all of these studies, no fully equivalent replacement for TiO2 with all of the requisite characteristics as an opacifier or colorant has been identified.
Herein, replacement efforts of TiO2 within the film-coated tablet (FCT) of a product under development at Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, are discussed. Replacement efforts for this product contained a unique set of challenges as the final fixed-dose combination product contains two co-formulated active pharmaceutical ingredients, API A and API B, each of which has known degradation pathways (Scheme 1). API A is a BCS Class I compound and a base-labile API. API B is a BCS Class II compound and has internally been shown to degrade under UV light, forming a phenol-related degradant and undergoing a color change from white to blue due to a second degradant theorized to be a dimerized bi-product of the photodegradants. In addition, API B is produced as a spray-dried intermediate (SDI), known to crystallize at elevated temperature and relative humidity conditions, which can potentially change physical form under the longer film coat processing time needed for TiO2 replacements. Two leading TiO2 replacement options being closely examined by the experts are calcium carbonate (CaCO3), a known base, and rice starch from natural products. A thorough investigation into the photostability, physical stability, and chemical stability of the fixed-dose combination drug product was designed and implemented to assess the feasibility of replacing TiO2 with three potential candidates detailed in Table 1: a CaCO3-based coating (Film Coat B), two rice starch-based coatings (Film Coat C and Film Coat D), and a control film coat containing no opacifiers (Film Coat E). Tablets containing a TiO2-based coating (Film Coat A) were carried through adjacent studies for use as a control and were used to demonstrate the comparability of replacement coatings. Photo-, chemical, and physical- stability were assessed using chromatography, spectrometry, physical measurements, and colorimetry and will be compared to existing TiO2-coated tablets.
Matthew J. Gunsch, Sara Koynov, Devan McCoy, Mario Gutierrez, Trent Eastman, Yun Chen, Jiaying Liu, Plamen Grigorov, Pankaj Aggarwal, Jonathan Fine, Leonardo R. Allain, Pavithra Sundararajan, Sanjaykumar Patel, Andre Hermans,
Stability impact from a titanium dioxide-free film-coated tablet: An analytical investigation into photo-, physical, and chemical stability of compressed tablets made with alternative film-coating materials,
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Volume 114, Issue 8, 2025, 103852, ISSN 0022-3549,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2025.103852.
Stability impact from a titanium dioxide-free film-coated tablet: An analytical investigation into photo-, physical, and chemical stability of compressed tablets made with alternative film-coating materials,
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Volume 114, Issue 8, 2025, 103852, ISSN 0022-3549,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2025.103852.
Read the full article here.
















































