Unveiling the impact of preparation methods, matrix/carrier type selection and drug loading on the supersaturation performance of amorphous solid dispersions

Abstract

Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) are widely recognized for their potential to enhance the solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs, with factors such as molecular mobility, intermolecular interactions, and storage conditions playing critical roles in their performance. However, the influence of preparation methods on their performance remains underexplored, especially regarding their supersaturation performance. To address this gap, the present study systematically investigates ASDs of ibuprofen (IBU, used as a model drug) prepared using two widely utilized techniques (solvent evaporation, SE, and melt-quench cooling, M-QC).

Three different matrices/carriers (Soluplus®, SOL, povidone, PVP, and copovidone, PVPVA) were employed to evaluate the combined influence of preparation method, matrix/carrier type, and drug loading on ASD performance. Supersaturation behavior during dissolution, particularly its dependence on the Sink Index (SI), was a key focus. All ASDs showed successful amorphization, but molecular near-order structures differed based on the preparation method. ATR-FTIR spectroscopy revealed stronger molecular interactions in M-QC ASDs (compared to SE). Dissolution studies under supersaturation conditions (SI = 0.1 and SI = 0.2) highlighted significant performance differences. M-QC ASDs consistently exhibited higher in vitro AUC(0→t) values under non-sink conditions compared to crystalline IBU.

Conversely, SE ASDs showed improved supersaturation primarily under low SI conditions, especially with SOL at low drug loadings. The findings underscore the need for a systematic approach in developing ASDs, considering preparation method, matrix type, drug loading and dissolution study conditions collectively. These factors significantly influence dissolution behavior and supersaturation, emphasizing that they should not be independently studied but evaluated comprehensively to optimize ASD performance.

Read more here

Materials

IBU was kindly given as a gift from Rontis Hellas S.A. (Athens, Greece). Graft copolymer Soluplus® (SOL), povidone (Kollidon® K12, PVP) and copovidone (Kollidon®VA64, PVPVA) were obtained from BASF (Ludwigshafen, Germany). All of the other reagents were of analytical or pharmaceutical grade and used as received.

Afroditi Kapourani, Ioannis Pantazos, Vasiliki Valkanioti, Melina Chatzitheodoridou, Christina Kalogeri, Panagiotis Barmpalexis, Unveiling the impact of preparation methods, matrix/carrier type selection and drug loading on the supersaturation performance of amorphous solid dispersions, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2025, 125242,
ISSN 0378-5173, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125242.


Read also our interesting article on TaBlitz:

TaBlitz: A new tablet design software that strives for patient centric drug product design

DIRECT CONTACT TO TABLITZ

TaBlitz: A new tablet design software that strives for patient centric drug product design
TaBlitz: A new tablet design software that strives for patient centric drug product design
You might also like