The Effect of Compression Pressure on the First Layer Surface Roughness and Delamination of Metformin and Evogliptin Bilayer and Trilayer Tablets

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the delamination of convex-shaped metformin HCl (MF) and evogliptin tartrate (EG) multi-layer tablets depending on the pre-compression and main compression pressures and simultaneously correlate these results with those of a surface roughness analysis. Free-flowing MF and EG (median diameters of 38.3 and 44.7 μm, respectively) granules prepared using the wet granulation method were pre-compressed and subsequently compressed into bilayer and trilayer tablets using a universal testing machine. The compaction force required to break the tablets increased linearly as the main compression pressure increased (30–150 MPa). Conversely, the interfacial strength and compaction breaking force decreased as the pre-compression pressure increased (10–110 MPa). A surface roughness analysis employing a profilometer revealed that the first layer (MF) roughness drastically decreased from 5.89 to 0.51 μm (Ra, arithmetic average of profile height deviations from the mean line) as the pre-compression pressure increased from 10 to 150 MPa in the bilayer tablet. Accordingly, the decrease in the roughness of the first layer reduced the inter-penetration at the interface, as observed via energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS)-equipped scanning electron microscopy, decreasing the interfacial bonding strength and causing delamination of the MF/EG multi-layer tablets. These findings indicate the significance of roughness control in the actual preparation of multi-layer tablets and the usefulness of profilometer- and EDS-based surface analyses for interpreting the delamination of multi-layer tablets.

1. Introduction

Multi-layer tablets (MLTs), including bilayer or trilayer tablets, are gaining considerable attention as effective tools for fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy, with advantages over conventional monolithic tablets [1,2]. Incompatible active ingredients can be formulated in separate layers, minimizing the contact area and providing a better physicochemical stability [3]. Moreover, MLTs can be designed to simultaneously provide immediate- and slow-release layers to provide the desired drug release profile for individual ingredients in a single-dosage form [4,5,6]. However, despite the several advantages of the MLT system, the fabrication process is complicated, with steps including die filling for the first layer, pre-compression, die filling for the second layer, main compression, unloading, and ejection [7]. This complex process occasionally causes more technical challenges compared to conventional monolithic tablets, including tablet defects such as delamination separation of individual layers at the interfaces during manufacturing, shipping, and storage [8,9].
Various physical and mechanical studies have been conducted to understand the factors that contribute to delamination or cracks in MLTs. Tablet defects are principally associated with interfacial adhesion between adjacent layers and the mechanical integrity of the solid dosage form [10]. Moreover, the difference in deformation and/or elastic recovery between the adjacent layers contributes to radial stress, causing delamination of the MLTs [11,12]. The interfacial bonding strength is reportedly significantly influenced by the compression properties of the individual layers and the process parameters, particularly the compression pressure and punch speed [12]. An appropriate compression pressure on the first layer (pre-compression) is required to flatten the first layer surface, reduce the volume of powder/granulated substances, and provide space to place the second layer [13,14]. However, the application of excess compression pressure leads to a lower interfacial roughness, which could promote MLT delamination by diminishing the intermolecular adherence between adjacent layers [15,16]. Particularly, when a plastic material (e.g., methylcellulose) is included in both layers, an increased pre-compression pressure (PRE-P) applied to the first layer causes a decline in the interfacial strength of the bilayer tablets [17]. To date, most mechanistic studies have been conducted using one or two components made of common pharmaceutical excipients, such as microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, or starch. However, the compression of one or two components does not represent actual pharmaceutical formulations, especially granules fabricated using wet or dry granulation methods, which are composed of drug substances, diluents, disintegrants, binders, and lubricants. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, quantitative measurements of surface roughness and its relationship with the mechanical strength of bilayer and trilayer tablets have not yet been reported to date.
Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of the compression pressure on the surface roughness of first layer, the compaction force required to break the MLTs, and the interfacial strength, and their correlations in the MLT pharmaceutical product. As a model product, metformin HCl (MF) and evogliptin tartrate (EG) fixed-dose combination tablets, currently prescribed to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, were employed [18,19,20]. MLTs are oval-shaped, convex tablets consisting of a sustained-release (SR) MF layer and an immediate-release (IR) EG layer [21]. The exact compositions of the mixtures subjected to granulation processes are listed in Table 1. In this study, the compaction force required to break MF/EG MLTs and the interfacial strength between the adjacent MF and EG layers depending on different PRE-Ps and main compression pressures (MAIN-Ps) were determined. Subsequently, the surface roughness of the first layer was quantitatively analyzed using a profilometer, and the correlation between the compaction breaking force and interfacial strength was investigated. A profilometer was used to determine commonly applied roughness parameters, and attempts have been made to correlate these values with other characteristic material parameters. Furthermore, the inter-penetration of the active ingredient of the first layer (MF) into the second layer (EG), depending on the PRE-P, was analyzed using energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS)-equipped scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

3.1. Materials

MF (median diameter of 38.33 μm) and EG drug powders (median diameter of 44.74 μm) were obtained from Granules India Limited (Madhapur, Hyderabad, India) and Dong-A ST (Seoul, Republic of Korea), respectively. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP K30) was purchased from BASF (Ludwigshafen Land, Rheinland, Pfalz, Germany). High-viscosity grade HPMC2208 (Methocel K100M) and methacrylic acid copolymers (Eudragit S100) were obtained from Dow Chemical (Montgomeryville, PA, USA) and Evonik (Essen, NRW, Germany), respectively. Carbomer 934P (Carbopol® 934P-NF) and mannitol (Pearlitol 100 SD) were obtained from BF-Goodrich (Cleveland, OH, USA) and Roquette (Lestrem, Pas de Calais, France), respectively. Low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose (L-HPC) and hydroxypropyl cellulose (Klucel LF) were obtained from Shin-Etsu Chemical (Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Japan) and Ashland (Wilmington, DE, USA), respectively. Pregelatinized starch (Starch 1500) and croscarmellose sodium (Ac-Di-Sol) were supplied by Colorcon (Harleysville, PA, USA) and FMC Corp. (Philadelphia, PA, USA), respectively. Colloidal silicon dioxide (Aeroperl 300) was purchased from Evonik (Essen, Germany). Magnesium stearate and red iron oxide (color index number of 77491) were acquired from FACI Asia Pacific (Merlimau Pl, Jurong Island, Singapore) and Univar (Billericay, Essex, UK), respectively.

 

Download the full study as PDF here: The Effect of Compression Pressure on the First Layer Surface Roughness and Delamination of Metformin and Evogliptin Bilayer and Trilayer Tablets

or read it here 

Kim, S.H.; Kook, J.H.; Seo, D.-W.; Kang, M.J. The Effect of Compression Pressure on the First Layer Surface Roughness and Delamination of Metformin and Evogliptin Bilayer and Trilayer Tablets. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1523.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16111523

You might also like