Oral delivery, by Gattefossé, remains the most patient friendly route of administration. Yet for peptides, it has long been considered an almost unreachable goal. Enzymatic degradation, low permeability and poor bioavailability have historically limited peptide drugs to injectable formulations.
Today, this paradigm is shifting. Thanks to advances in peptide design and formulation science, lipid based excipients are emerging as powerful enablers of oral peptide delivery. In this article, we explore why lipids and peptides are compatible, how lipid based formulations can address key peptide oral delivery challenges, and how Gattefossé supports formulators in this rapidly evolving field.
Lipids and peptides: let’s end the myth
Peptides are often perceived as incompatible with lipid‑based formulations because they are typically hydrophilic, large molecules with limited membrane permeability. While this is true for many peptides, it is far from the full picture.
A peptide does not need to be lipophilic to benefit from lipid‑based excipients. Two well‑known oral peptide medicines illustrate this clearly:
- Ciclosporin (princeps: Neoral®), a lipophilic peptide formulated as an oral solution mainly composed of corn oil-mono-di-triglycerides (Maisine® CC);
- Octreotide acetate (Mycapssa®), a hydrophilic peptide successfully formulated using glyceryl monocaprylate and glyceryl tricaprylate along with a permeation enhancer.
These examples demonstrate that lipid‑based excipients can be used across a broad spectrum of peptide profiles, provided the formulation strategy is well adapted.
Why is oral peptide delivery so challenging?
Despite their therapeutic potential, peptides face three major barriers when administered orally:
1. Degradation in the gastrointestinal environment: stomachacidic pH and proteolytic enzymes found in both stomach and duodenum can alter peptide structure.
2. Solubility: peptide solubility is strongly influenced by pH, ionic strength and molecular structure. A peptide may be soluble in gastric conditions but poorly soluble in the intestine—or vice versa—making absorption unpredictable.
3. Permeability: most peptides exhibit very low intestinal permeability because of their large size and hydrophilicity, which limit passive diffusion through the intestinal epithelium.
Overcoming these three hurdles is the key to successful oral peptide delivery.

Increase peptide solubility through formulation
For hydrophilic peptides, a lipidization or hydrophobization step by ion pairing is often required to increase logP and facilitate incorporation into lipid systems.
Lipid‑based formulations (LBF) offer versatile solutions depending on peptide properties:
-
LBF type I/II: for lipophilic peptides, which will be solubilized in oils and co‑surfactants;
- LBF type III/IV (SEDDS, SMEDDS, SNEDDS): for hydrophilic peptides, which will be suspended or dispersed with surfactants.
-
SLN and NLC: innovative nanocarriers offering protection and solubilization, but this technology still lacks industrial scale-up possibilities.
Enhancing intestinal permeability: the role of lipids
For peptides, absorption often relies on the paracellular pathway, which is tightly regulated by intestinal tight junctions. Medium‑chain fatty acid esters (C8–C10) are known to transiently open tight junctions, while preserving epithelial integrity.

Continue reading the original article here
Following excipients are mentioned in the study besides other: Labrasol™ ALF, Labrafac™ MC60, Capryol 90
Source: Gattefossé, website Oral peptide delivery with lipid-based excipients | Gattefossé










































All4Nutra








