What are the most popular excipients in 2024 and what has changed in the last 20 years? The numbers say: “Not a lot” but let´s go a little bit more in detail and check diverse angles. In this edition we do not have a look at the volumes but use in applications both in academia and industry. This listing is certainly not complete (main focus on oral solids) and not super accurate but should give an insight on the topic. There might be less common excipients that are not on the radar but gain importance. Please get in touch with us if you have further data so that we can adapt the information shared accordingly.
Why look at “popularity” at all?
When an excipient turns up again and again in peer-reviewed papers, it is a good sign that:
- regulators are scrutinising it,
- formulators are pushing its boundaries, or
- novel types, grades and co-processed variants are entering the market.
Add trade-site visibility and you also capture what the industrial readership actually clicks on: supplier notes, regulatory alerts, application case studies. Taken together, the two lenses provide an early-warning radar for both opportunities and head-winds.
How the data was collected
1. PubMed scan: run for 60 common excipients. Ranked list by number of 2024 publications.
2. Trade-site scan: Manual search of PharmaExcipients.com for posts dated 1 Jan – 31 Dec 2024 that name the same excipients. Counted “dedicated” posts plus appearances in composition round-ups (e.g., “50 FDA approvals 2024”).
3. Cross-match: Aligned the two datasets to see where scientific focus and industry interest overlap – or diverge.18 of 20 excipients show up strongly on both lists.
The 2024 Top-20 (PubMed) and their PharmaExcipients footprint
The data shows the excipient use in scientific publications and can give some indications about what academia is currently working with and potentially the industry will use in the future.
| Rank | Excipient (primary role) | 2024 PubMed hits | Dedicated 2024 post on PharmaExcipients? | Typical 2024 theme on the site |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microcrystalline cellulose | ≈ 450 | ✔ | Renewable sources, MCC-DCP co-processing |
| 2 | HPMC | ≈ 410 | ✔ | Matrix variability, coating with mannitol |
| 3 | Povidone / Crospovidone | ≈ 370 | ✔ | Low-nitrite grades, binder performance |
| 4 | Polyethylene glycol (PEG) | ≈ 360 | ✔ | Macrogol supplier specs, allergy updates |
| 5 | Sodium starch glycolate | ≈ 290 | (◒) composition lists | Super-disintegrant in off-patent tablets |
| 6 | Mannitol | ≈ 270 | ✔ | Cryoprotectant for biologics |
| 7 | Lactose monohydrate | ≈ 250 | ✔ | Form & function in DPI/ODTs |
| 8 | Magnesium stearate | ≈ 230 | ✔ | Fatty-acid profile vs lubrication |
| 9 | Dicalcium phosphate | ≈ 210 | ✔ | MCC–DCP compaction data |
| 10 | Croscarmellose sodium | ≈ 200 | ✔ | Extrusion-spheronisation aid |
| 11 | Poloxamer 188 | ≈ 180 | ✔ | Protein-formulation surfactant |
| 12 | Carbomer (Carbopol) | ≈ 170 | ✔ | Rheology, nitrosamine control |
| 13 | Colloidal silicon dioxide | ≈ 160 | ✔ | Flow & glidant optimisation |
| 14 | Gelatin | ≈ 150 | ✔ | Capsule-shell variability |
| 15 | Sodium lauryl sulfate | ≈ 140 | (◒) approval lists | Slowly declining, safety debate |
| 16 | Sorbitol | ≈ 130 | ✔ | Nitrosamine risk in polyols |
| 17 | Chitosan | ≈ 120 | ✔ | Bio-adhesive DDS review |
| 18 | Maize starch (native / pre-gelatinised) | ≈ 110 | ✖ | Trade site interest has shifted to newer disintegrants |
| 19 | Propylene glycol | ≈ 105 | ✔ | Ph.Eur. monograph update |
| 20 | Citric acid | ≈ 95 | (◒) composition lists | Buffer in antibiotic IVs |
Major Excipients in US medicinal products as per “Pharmaceutical Excipients – The Past and Future – Ermens 2004
Back in 2004 Ermens put together this overview which covers the use of excipients in US medicinal products.

Ermens Table 2004 updated with data from 2024
Below is the short‑list that Herman Ermens highlighted in “Pharmaceutical Excipients – The Past and Future” (Business Briefing: Pharmagenerics, 2004) when he asked, “Which excipients show up in the largest number of U.S.‑marketed medicines?” The same core roster is still echoed two decades later by the International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council (IPEC‑Americas) FAQ page and by cross‑checks against the FDA Inactive Ingredient Database.
| Excipient | Function (primary) | Typical role in oral / parenteral products | Why it is so common |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnesium Stearate | Lubricant | Minimises punch sticking & ejection friction in tablets; capsule plug lubricant | Excellent boundary lubrication at ≤1 % w/w; cheap; pharmacopeial grades widely available |
| Lactose (anhydrous & monohydrate) | Diluent / Filler | Adds bulk to low‑dose APIs; some dry‑powder inhalers | Good mouth‑feel, compressibility, long safety record |
| Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC) | Binder / Diluent | Direct‑compression aid, wet‑granulation binder | Porous compressible particles create hard tablets at low force |
| Starch (corn starch, pre‑gelatinised) | Diluent / Disintegrant | Swells on hydration to split tablets; filler in hard‑gelatin capsules | Food‑source, GRAS, very low cost |
| Colloidal Silicon Dioxide | Glidant | Improves powder flow; anti‑caking | Nano‑scale particles reduce inter‑particle friction |
| Titanium Dioxide | Opacifier / Pigment | Gives white film‑coats, protects light‑sensitive APIs | Chemically inert, high hiding power |
| Stearic Acid | Lubricant | Tablet lubricant when magnesium stearate is contraindicated (e.g. basic APIs) | Acidic surface pH; vegetable grades available |
| Sodium Starch Glycolate (SSG) | Super‑disintegrant | Rapid swelling ➜ fast tablet break‑up | Effective at 2‑4 % w/w; tolerant to hydrophobic actives |
| Gelatin | Shell former / Matrix | Hard‑ or soft‑gel capsules; vaccine stabiliser | Forms strong films, melts near body temperature |
| Talc | Glidant / Lubricant | Improves flow & acts as anti‑tack in film coating | Physically inert lamellar mineral |
| Sucrose | Sweetener / Filler | Syrups, lozenges, chewables | Palatable, high solubility, good compressibility when co‑crystallised |
| Calcium Stearate | Lubricant | Lubricant for acidic formulations & Effervescents | Lower soap‑taste vs Mg‑stearate; calcium source |
| Povidone (PVP, Kollidon) | Binder / Film former | Solution & dry binders; immediate‑release film coats | Water‑soluble, chemically stable, PVP‑Iodine antiseptic variant |
| Pregelatinised Starch | Diluent / Binder | Direct‑compression filler; binder in wet granulation | Dual functionality reduces raw‑material count |
| Hypromellose (HPMC) | Binder / Coat | Film‑coats, controlled‑release matrices, veg‑caps | Wide viscosity grades, cellulose‑based (vegetarian) |
| OPA products (Opadry®, etc.) | Coating system | Ready‑mixed HPMC/PEG/colour pigment systems | Reproducible coating; simplifies validation |
| Croscarmellose Sodium | Super‑disintegrant | Cross‑linked cellulose fibres that wick water | Rapid capillary action even in high‑drug‑load tablets |
| Hydroxypropyl Cellulose (HPC) | Binder / Matrix former | Low‑dose binder; hot‑melt extruded matrices | Thermoplastic; good for taste‑masked granules |
| Ethylcellulose | Film former / Barrier | Insoluble coats for sustained release | High moisture‑ & alcohol‑resistance |
| Calcium Phosphate (dibasic) | Diluent / Compressibility aid | High‑density filler; good for small tablets | Brittle fracture creates strong compacts |
| Crospovidone | Super‑disintegrant | Cross‑linked PVP offering extremely fast disintegration | Chemically inert toward most APIs |
| Shellac (pharm. glaze) | Enteric / Gloss coat | Enteric protection, moisture barrier, tablet logo gloss | Natural resin; cures at low temperature |
Ermens Table 2004 updated with data from 2024 incl. ranking in – U.S. oral tablets & capsules
The similar tabke as above but ranked based on counts drawn from the FDA Inactive Ingredient Database Q1‑2024 dump cross‑checked against the Pillbox/RxNorm master file; % = share of the 42 k‑plus marketed oral‑solid SKUs.
| 2024 Rank | Excipient | Main role(s) | % of oral SKUs¹ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magnesium Stearate | Lubricant | ≈ 72 % |
| 2 | Lactose (anhyd./mono.) | Diluent | ≈ 45 % |
| 3 | Microcrystalline Cellulose | Binder/diluent | ≈ 42 % |
| 4 | Corn / Pregel. Starch | Diluent + disintegrant | ≈ 28 % |
| 5 | Povidone (PVP) | Binder / film former | ≈ 27 % |
| 6 | Titanium Dioxide | Opacifier | ≈ 26 % |
| 7 | Colloidal Silicon Dioxide | Glidant | ≈ 24 % |
| 8 | Talc | Glidant / anti‑tack | ≈ 22 % |
| 9 | Hypromellose (HPMC) | Film coat / matrix | ≈ 21 % |
| 10 | Croscarmellose Sodium | Super‑disintegrant | ≈ 18 % |
| 11 | Sodium Starch Glycolate | Super‑disintegrant | ≈ 15 % |
| 12 | Gelatin | Capsule/film former | ≈ 14 % |
| 13 | Stearic Acid | Lubricant | ≈ 13 % |
| 14 | Calcium Phosphate (dibasic) | High‑density filler | ≈ 12 % |
| 15 | Calcium Stearate | Lubricant (acidic APIs) | ≈ 10 % |
| 16 | Crospovidone | Super‑disintegrant | ≈ 9 % |
| 17 | Pregel. Starch | DC filler / binder | ≈ 8 % |
| 18 | Hydroxypropyl Cellulose | Binder / hot‑melt matrix | ≈ 7 % |
| 19 | Ethylcellulose | SR coat / matrix | ≈ 6 % |
| 20 | Ready‑mix HPMC coats | Branding / colour | ≈ 5 % |
¹ Rounded to nearest percent; the ordinals shift by only ±1–2 positions versus the 2004 Ermens list.
What has changed?
Ermens’ 2004 snapshot relied on counting frequency in U.S. New Drug Applications (NDAs) and ANDAs filed up to that time.¹ The first ten alone appeared in >60 % of solid‑oral submissions. Follow‑up surveys by IPEC‑Americas (2023) show only modest shifts—mainly:
- Polymeric film‑coaters (HPMC systems) have climbed as more products use colour branding and controlled release.
- Titanium dioxide is under scrutiny in Europe, but no U.S. ban so far; several firms are evaluating CaCO₃ ± starch as TiO₂‑free whites.
- Co‑processed excipients (e.g., MCC‑silica, lactose‑cellulose agglomerates) are gaining ground but still reference their parent monographs.
- Talc and it´s future as a pharmaceutical excipient. Watch the FDA Expert Panel June 2025
Four take-aways for formulators
- Cellulosics still rule the citation count MCC and HPMC alone contributed roughly one-fifth of all excipient-focused papers in 2024 – and each drew multiple high-traffic posts on PharmaExcipients. Expect the debate on particle-engineering and sustainable sourcing to stay hot.
- Functionality-enhancing polymers are climbing fast Poloxamer 188, Carbopol and Chitosan each rose several places compared with 2023, reflecting the push toward complex delivery systems (biologics, muco-adhesive films, injectables).
- Regulatory topics amplify site traffic Posts on low-nitrite povidone, residual PEG toxicity or updated Ph.Eur. specs for propylene glycol generated disproportionate clicks – a reminder that compliance questions often drive industry attention more than breakthrough science does.
- What the lab neglects, industry still needs Talc, polysorbates and trehalose fell just outside the PubMed top-20 yet garnered dozens of 2024 trade-site mentions – chiefly because they remain ubiquitous in approved products. Keeping an eye on both datasets prevents blind spots.
Conclusion
The near-perfect overlap between PubMed’s “most-studied” list and the excipients highlighted on PharmaExcipients.com tells a clear story: what formulators research, the market reads about.
Watch out for the next edition of more special / niche excipients and their role in medicines.
Read the original article here
Source: Philippe Tschopp, LinkedIn page (37) Top 20 Pharmaceutical Excipients 2004 – 2024 | LinkedIn
















































